@vgmlr · 3y 80d The Standard Model and Quantum Mechanics are wrong by no less than 0.25952 or 25.952% ..and all theorems to compensate for the difference has polluted a simplified solution which is to high/low an impedance field --> #ResistanceTheory
@vgmlr · 3y 86d As waves can change ~in-flight or have ~dual modulation, this can give a threshold state before resistive (collision) state and permit a transmissible state beyond the point of resistance. This threshold can account for artifact reflection and transparency.
@vgmlr · 3y 86d Here referenced is one of the most glaring discrepancies in the Standard Model and Quantum Mechanics: vibration aka energy, that which requires empty space for displacement. This empty space, or nothing, must not impede all super- theories yet, this then requires accepting an incomplete solution to the theory of everything by accounting for the space around everything. #ResistanceTheory instead alters the state of a given space (low/high threshold) in a field using wave compression/collision, so as everything matters (pun intended).
@vgmlr · 3y 184d Yet an inactive or decelerated state is never suggested; it is either occupied or unoccupied, which defies the very concept of occupied. The red flag of any physicist's credibility is utilizing multi-dimensional additions to accommodate. #ResistanceTheory
@vgmlr · 3y 219d The issue with the defined states of matter still affixed to the same molecular identity (ex. ice = water = vapor) is that expansion requires inclusion of foreign segregation densities. Obviously nothing can not exist so when a solid melts to a liquid, there is inclusion which shd change the molecular perspective of the matter --> ie H2O as water shd be reflected differently as bonding changes. The admission of 'nothing' or rather the dismissing of 'something else' plagues the fundamental understanding of all matter and is excused with gravity or electromagnetism. #ResistanceTheory states that pattern changes are within an existing field therefore state changes are pressure and velocity only, not molecular displacement.
@vgmlr · 3y 221d >particles are primary Yet are all different. ヽ(ಠ_ಠ)ノ >primary (adj) 3. fundamental Require exchange in nothingness to subsist. >maybe vibrating strings Vibration requires space to deflect. Vibration requires resistance to restrain. >strings in a field then Then the field is the primary: Welcome to #ResistanceTheory
@vgmlr · 3y 233d Aym embarrassed for modern science (fiction). Time travel, or what it shd be known as - data restoration - is a demonstrably idiotic concept by the very people who require perpetually expanding amounts of data storage for the research they hypothesize said theory. To offer them some help in their narrative; why not make use of the expanding universe as storage capacity thus the 'Big Bang' was a fresh install and we are now in Windows 14,000,000,000 - thereby the expansion displacement gaps are /windows.old
@vgmlr · 3y 267d There is a folly in the perception of time in physics which permits the concept of forward and backward --> imagine a vibration: a single point travels (changes position in frames) forward by two (universal field travel plus energetic transition) then stays in place on return (forward universal travel minus energetic transition). There then is no backwards but rather a static resistance. This of course relies on a particle model which is wrong --> read #ResistanceTheory
@vgmlr · 4y 48d >gravity wells What luck that despite outward high velocity trajectory based on the Big Bang model, that matter would venturi w/o supposed resistance and then collaborate creating near identical orbital models. Physicists shd sell the "fail rate".
